Organizational Rigidity On Output Performance

Project and Seminar Material for Business Administration and Management BAM

Organizational Rigidity On Output Performance


Abstract


The study examined Organizational rigidity on output performance, a case study of Cadbury Plc.

The study employed the survey design and the purposive sampling technique to select 450 staff across management, senior and junior level. A well-constructed questionnaire, which was adjudged valid and reliable, was used for collection of data from the respondents. The data obtained through the administration of the questionnaires was analyzed using the Pearson correlation analysis.

The results showed that there is positive and significant relationship between organizational rigidity and output performance (r=.896; p<0.05). This implies that organizational rigidity is crucial factor and strong predictor of output performance in Nigerian.

The study concluded that organizational rigidity has a significant impact on output performance in Nigerian manufacturing firm.

The study suggested that; Organization(s) should be seen as an element of a society which people bring different ideology from their own society into the organization, so such organizations will possess the paradoxical quality of being “part of” or “a part” of a society; organizational rigidity in any organization must fosters success and it should be seen as one of the most important factors that can account for success or failure of an organization; Organizational development in firms must have particular features that can increase sustainability on basis of effectiveness; The enhancement in output performance in all organization must contributes to employee commitment while norms, values and objectives should contribute in maintaining rigidity in organizations.


Chapter One


1.0 Introduction

In today’s competitive environment, the capacity to stimulate output performance has become a critical factor in an organization’s survival. Organizational rigidity is one of the most critical factors that influence the organization’s response to its external environment (Schein, 1985). The common rigid values of an organization provide a framework that influences and directs employees’ behavior. Research suggests that organizations that focus on internal stability and conformance with rigidity without an open systems approach (Senge, 1990) to cope with today’s fast-moving, technology-driven external environment are at a significant competitive disadvantage, as they lack the capacity to produce meaningful output (Hult, Ketchen, & Nichols, 2002). However, the current research is examining the impact of organizational rigidity on output performance.


1.1 Background To The Study

Given the importance of stability in improving firm’s output performance, a number of studies have attempted to identify the factors that can enhance organizational rigidity (Koc & Ceylan, 2007). Currently one of the variables deemed to have great influence on output performance is organizational rigidity (Büschgens, Bausch, & Balkin, 2013; Lin, Donough, Lin, & Lin, 2013). Because organizational rigidity influences employees’ behavior, it may lead the personnel to accept output performance as a fundamental value of the organization and to feeling more involved in it (Hartmann, 2006).

The idea of viewing organization as having rigid is a recent phenomenon and it originated as an independent variable affecting employees’ performance and output performance. Coupled with the recent academic interest on this concept, researchers have sought to identify and elaborate the theoretical construct that underpins rigidity in order to develop a more comprehensive theory. Organization(s) constitute an element of a society and people bring different ideology from their own society into the organization. Organizations possess the paradoxical quality of being “part of” or “a part” of a society; which are embedded in a social context. Then, the norms that has been keeping the company going must remain unchanged. The organizations are communities in their own right with distinctive rules and values, organizational rigidity fosters success and it is therefore one of the most important factors that can account for success or failure of an organization.

Organizational Rigidity is an anthropological term that refers to the underlying values, beliefs, codes of practice that makes a community what it is (Alvesson, 2002; Huczynski and Buchaman, 2001; Smith, Kleiner & Brian, 1987). Numerous theoretical debates have centred on whether organizational rigidity should be managed in the same way that other organizational variables can be controlled.

Organizational development has some particular features that can increase sustainability on basis of effectiveness. The enhancement in output performance contributes to employee commitment while norms, values and objectives contribute in maintaining rigidity in an organization (Awadh & Saad, 2013). Most of us contribute a great part of their time in organizations. The organizational behaviour which is related to practitioner’s values and beliefs is based on rigid elements and norms that influence personality and performance of organization (Sondergaard, 1994). These rigid organizational elements and personality effects behaviour and sustainability of organization (Schwartz, 1994) the strong relationship of organizational rigidity has been identified several research. Output performance is comprised of the actual output or results of an organization as measured against its intended outputs (or goals and objectives). One of the most important reasons that explain the interest in organizational rigidity is the assumption that certain organizational rigid values lead to an increase in output performance. (Ilies & Gavrea).

Output performance comprises the actual productions as well as outcomes or outcomes of an organization which are measured against its expected outcomes. According to (Kaplan & Norton, 1992) no single measure can provide a clear performance target, so managers have to choose between financial and operational measures.


1.2 Statement Of The Problems

While these foundations have been given by researchers such as Alvesson (2002); Parker and Bradley (2000); Thompson and McHugh (2002); Smith et al (1987) on organizational rigidity, they have generally ignored the practical aspect of output performance. For instance, Alvesson (2002) survey of US Corporations, reported that firms that were perceived to believe in something or stands for something are the high performers and they believe in rigid culture. In a UK study, Ogbonna and Harris (2001) research on 50 companies reported that about 94% of organizations were undergoing or have experienced unchangeable value and pattern. Such empirical evidence showed that there is a gap between academic theories (which are critical of the idea of planned rigid values) and the actions of the practitioners, (who are the ones involved in the various forms of organizational interaction). This research will examine the different perspectives to organisational rigidity and the classification of the concept as an asset or liability. The reason being that human resource of every organization is its backbone, such that the successes or failures of any organization now depends on the workers. Organizations not only want to survive but also to grow and take over or even overtake existing competitors. These compels organizations to devise strong and unchangeable values, beliefs, behaviours, norms and strategies targeted at not just attracting, cultivating and retaining their employees but also giving the organization competitive edge. Consequently, lack of these rigid values, beliefs and norms (organizational rigidity) could result in undesirable outcomes such as job dissatisfaction, lack of commitment, absenteeism, low productivity and overall poor output performance.


1.3 Objectives Of The Study

The following are the objectives of this study:

  1. To examine the influence of organizational rigidity on output performance in an organization.
  2. To analyze the advantages and disadvantages of organizational rigidity.
  3. To find out the determinants of output performance in an organization.

1.4 Research Questions

  1. What is the influence of organizational rigidity on output performance in an organization?
  2. What are the advantages and disadvantages of organizational rigidity?
  3. What are the determinants of output performance in an organization?

1.5 Research Hypothesis

HO: There is no significant relationship between organization rigidity and output performance in an organization.


1.6 Significance Of The Study

The following are the significance of this study:

The findings from this study will form a useful organizational framework for business managers, other organizational stakeholders and the general public in managing organizational rigid values and norm to produce the needed output performance.

This research will be a contribution to the body of literature in the area of organizational rigidity and output performance, thereby constituting the empirical literature for future research in the subject area.


1.7 Scope Of The Study

This study is limited to Cadbury Plc, a multinational organization in Nigeria. It will also cover the company’s organizational rigidity and output performance


1.8 Limitation Of The Study

Financial constraint- Insufficient fund tends to impede the efficiency of the researcher in sourcing for the relevant materials, literature or information and in the process of data collection (internet, questionnaire and interview).

Time constraint- The researcher will simultaneously engage in this study with other academic work. This consequently will cut down on the time devoted for the research work.


1.9 Organization Of The Variables

Dependent Variable: Organizational rigidity

Independents Variable: Output performance


1.11 Definition Of Terms

Performance:

Is deemed to be the fulfillment of an obligation,

Output:

The amount of something produced by employees, machine, or industry

Rigidity:

Inability to be changed

Values:

Principles or standards of practices/behaviour; organizational judgement of what is important in the work settings


Organizational Rigidity On Output Performance


Project Material Download

3,000 Naira


The complete material will be sent to you in just 2 steps.

Quick & Simple…


Step One Purchase

Make payment of ₦3,000: through USSD Transfer, Bank Mobile App, ATM Transfer, or POS Transfer to:

Access Bank PlcAccount No.: 0811003731
Name: Samphina Academy
Account Type: Current

Or Click Here to pay with Debit Card

FOR CLIENTS OUTSIDE NIGERIA:
Click Here to pay with Debit Card ($15)
GHANA – Make Payment of 60 GHS to MTN MoMo, 0553978005, Douglas Osabutey 

  PAY WITH CRYPTOCURRENCY


Step Two Purchase

Send the following details through Text Message or WhatsApp Messenger | +234-8143831497

  • Payment Details 
  • Email Address 
  • Organizational Rigidity On Output Performance

The complete material will be sent to your email address after receiving your payment information | T & C Apply


  Contact Our Help Desk


You may also like:

⚠️ Need a different topic? Perform a quick search



Get A Complete Business Plan For Any Business In Nigeria

Business Plan for Businesses in Nigeria

  Business Plans in Nigeria


Organizational Rigidity On Output Performance


Disclaimer

This research material “Organizational Rigidity On Output Performance” is for research purposes and should be used as a guide in developing your research project / seminar work. For no reason should you copy word for word (verbatim) as samphina.com.ng will not be liable for any who copied the material.

The aim of providing this material is to reduce the stress of moving from one school library to another all in the name of searching for research materials. This service is legal because, all institutions permit their students to read previous projects, books, articles or papers while developing their own works. According to Austin Kleon “All creative work builds on what came before”.

samphina.com.ng is only providing this material “Organizational Rigidity On Output Performance” as a reference for your research. The paper should be used as a guide or framework for your own paper. The contents of this paper should be able to help you in generating new ideas and thoughts for your own research. Use it as a guidance purpose only.


How to defend your research work


This is a general guide on how to defend your research work:

1. Prepare For Questions:

If you are preparing for questions that may be asked during your defense, then your answers will flow smoothly and effectively. This will prove your knowledge on the subject e.g “Organizational Rigidity On Output Performance“, and strengthening your argument. Ask friends and family, read your work for them to listen to your presentation, and write down questions. You may be lucky the panel will ask you those you have already prepared on.

2. Strong Summary:

Summarizing your chapters will help keep your audience focused because it is easy for a mind to drift, so providing summaries will ensure your panel will follow along, even if they lose focus for a brief moment. Visual aides, such as graphs and power-point presentations can be very helpful. If you are going to use these, make sure you will practice your presentation with them.

3. Be Confident in Your Research Work:

Not knowing your topic “Organizational Rigidity On Output Performance” inside out will cause you to struggle and ultimately fail with your defense. You need to know the subject from every angle to ensure you are fully prepared for any question that may come your way.

4. Conclusion:

Reinforce your findings to conclude your defense. The finale of your presentation should focus on proving the work that has been done. You may need to recap on what has changed and remained unchanged, if is necessary.

5 . Listen:

Before you get defensive or recite a particular answer, make sure you truly understand the question being asked. Being a good listener is an important quality, because providing an inaccurate or off-topic answer will also weaken the validity of your paper.


Frequently Asked Questions


What are the components of organizational performance according to Richard?

According to Richard, the organizational performance includes three specific areas of firm outcomes: 1 financial performance (profits, return on assets, return on investment, etc.); 2 product market performance (sales, market share, etc.); and. 3 shareholder return (total shareholder return, economic value added, etc.).

What is organisational performance?

Organizational performance means the actual output or results of an organization as measured against its intended outputs (or goals and objectives). According to Richard, the organizational performance includes three specific areas of firm outcomes:

What is output in Organizational Management?

Organizational Output Introduction Output generally refers to the things produced. output, in terms of the production unit means total number of products generated for a given duration and the various cost associated with the production. Outputs also refer to the number of customers visited in a given time.

What is the difference between organizational performance and unsourced material?

Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Organizational performance comprises the actual output or results of an organization as measured against its intended outputs (or goals and objectives). Organizational performance also the success or fulfilment of organization at end of program or projects as it is intended.

What are Richard’s three components of organizational performance?

According to Richard, the organizational performance includes three specific areas of firm outcomes: 1 financial performance (profits, return on assets, return on investment, etc.); 2 product market performance (sales, market share, etc.); and 3 shareholder return (total shareholder return, economic value added, etc.).

What is organisational performance?

Organizational performance means the actual output or results of an organization as measured against its intended outputs (or goals and objectives). According to Richard, the organizational performance includes three specific areas of firm outcomes:

What is the most critical factor in an organization’s overall performance?

In fact, how well these human resources are managed is probably the most critical factor in an organization’s overall performance. Internal factors are connected, that they all tend to affect or interact with each other.

What are the factors that affect the structure of an organization?

These factors, which determine the structure, aims, and activities of the organization, can be grouped into: External factors: Those from the enabling environments which are not under the control of the organization but which affect its structure and development.

What are the best measures of organizational performance?

What Are the Best Measures of Organizational Performance? Valuing your scheme | The Pensions Regulator Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies Valuation – RICS What is value-based

What affects organizational performance?

“This study highlights the effect of menopause symptoms on cognitive functioning and demonstrates a link between severe depressive and sexual symptoms, specifically, with cognitive performance. Mood disturbances are common in the menopause transition and can affect memory and sexual functioning.

What does organizational performance mean?

Organizational performance means the actual output or results of an organization as measured against its intended outputs (or goals and objectives). Definition of Organizational Performance According to Richard, the organizational performance includes three specific areas of firm outcomes:

How does organizational structure affect performance?

Such divergence decreases performance, when growing as a wrong organizational structure may hamper cooperation and thus hinder the completion of orders in due time and within limits of resources and budgets. Organizational structures should be adaptive to process requirements, aiming to optimize the ratio of effort and input to output.

Is insourcing more expensive for an organization?

Insourcing is typically more expensive for an organization as a result of implementing new processes to start a different division of the organization. Insourcing utilizes developed resources within the organization to perform tasks or to achieve a goal.

What is the difference between outsourcing and insourcing jobs and work?

While outsourcing jobs and work are often a major discussion regarding the U.S. economy, insourcing is relatively common and is seeing greater usage by companies seeking better control of important projects and tasks. 1 Law firms are an example of companies that use insourcing. 

Samphina Academy

Samphina Academy is an Online Educational Resource Center that is aimed at providing students with quality information and materials to aid them in succeeding in their academic pursuit.