Influence Of Social Networking On The Academic Performance Of Caritas University Students

Project and Seminar Material for Mass Communication

Influence Of Social Networking On The Academic Performance Of Caritas University Students


This study examined the influence of social networking on the academic performance of Caritas university student. A study of Caritas University students. Quantitative survey method was adopted for the study. The population consists of 200 undergraduate students. The study made use of Taro Yame’s formula to sample 133 students. Questionnaires were employed as the instrument for data collection. The questionnaire was administered to 100 randomly selected students. The entire questionnaires administered were duly filled and retrieved given a high response rate of 100%.

Chapter One


1.1 Background of the Study

The internet plays a fundamental role in organizations and societies. The basic fact justifies the information revolution that has been taking place across the globe in recent times. The term internet, according to Cawkell in Ogedegbe (2006, p.152) is a large computer network formed out of some thousands of interconnected networks, and it supports a whole range of services such as electronic, file transfer protocol, data base access and many others. It is therefore not surprising the success story behind the advent of the internet. It is also known as a network that links computers all over the world by satellite and telephone, connecting users with service networks such as Email and the world wide web. Today the internet has linked thousands of nations and enterprises across the world. Hence the world which appears physically large has been made small by the internet and justifies the reference to the world as a global village.

The internet gave rise to the birth of social networking sites, which, according to Okenwa (2008, p. 15) are web-based services that allow individuals to (1) construct a public or semi-public profile within a bounded system, (2) articulate a list of other users with whom they share a connection, and (3) view and traverse their list of connections and those made by others within the system. What makes social network sites unique is not that they allow individuals to meet strangers, but rather that they enable users to articulate and make visible their social networks.

This can result in connections between individuals that would not otherwise be made, but that is often not the goal, and these meetings are frequently between “existing ties” who share some offline connection (Hawthorn, 2005). On many of the large social networking sites, participants are not necessarily “networking” or looking to meet new people; instead, they are primarily communicating with people who are already a part of their extended social network.

Social networking began in 1978 with the Bulletin Board System (or BBS.) The BBS was hosted on personal computers, requiring that users dial in through the modem of the host computer, exchanging information over phone lines with other users. This was the first system that allowed users to sign in and interact with each other; it was quite slow since only one user could be logged in at a time. Later in the year, the very first copies of web browsers were distributed using the bulletin board, Usenet. Usenet was created by Jim Ellis and Tom Truscott, and it allowed users to post news articles or posts, which were referred to as ―news‖. The difference between Usenet and other BBS and forums was that it didn‘t have a dedicated administrator or central server. There are modern forums that use the same idea as Usenet today, including Yahoo Groups and Google Groups.

The first version of instant messaging came about in 1988 with Internet Relay Chat (IRC). IRC was Unix-based, limiting access for most people. It was used for link and file sharing, and generally keeping in touch with one another. Geocities was among the first social networking sites on the internet, launching its website in 1994. Its intent was to allow users to create their own websites, dividing them into groups based on the website‘s content. In 1995, was launched, offering users the ability to interact with people who held the same interests and publish their own content. Two years later, in 1997, AOL Instant Messenger and were launched. This was the year instant messaging became popular and it was the first time internet users were able to create a profile and be-friend each other.

Friendster, created in 2002 was the pioneer of social networking. In its first three months, the social networking website acquired 3 million users, amounting to 1 in 126 internet users being members at the time. Friendster served as the launching point for the widely popular MySpace, which cloned Friendster and launched after just 10 days of coding. In the following years, other social networking websites like, LinkedIn and started to come up, including what was to be the most popular social networking website in internet history, was launched in 2004 with the intent to connect U.S. college students, starting with Harvard College. In its first month, over half of the 19,500 students signed up. After gaining popularity, Facebook opened its registration to non-college students, and in 2008, Facebook surpassed MySpace as the leading social networking website. Social networking has come a long way since 1978, and we will all witness its evolution for years to come, forever changing the way people connect with one another.

While social network sites have implemented a wide variety of technical features, their backbone consists of visible profiles that display an articulated list of Friends who are also users of the system. Profiles are unique pages where one can “type oneself into being” Sunder (2003, p. 3). After joining a social network site, an individual is asked to fill out forms containing a series of questions. The profile is generated using the answers to these questions, which typically include descriptors such as age, location, interests, and an “about me” section. Most sites also encourage users to upload a profile photo. Some sites allow users to enhance their profiles by adding multimedia content or modifying their profile’s look and feel. Others, such as Facebook, allow users to add modules (“Applications”) that enhance their profile.

After joining a social network site, users are asked to identify others in the system with which they have a relationship. Most social network sites require bi-directional confirmation for Friendship, but some do not. These one-directional ties are sometimes labelled as “Fans” or “Followers,” but many sites call these Friends as well. The term “Friends” can be misleading, because the connection does not necessarily mean friendship in the everyday vernacular sense, and the reasons people connect are varied (Boyd, 2006).

These sites also provide a mechanism for users to leave messages on their Friends’ profiles. This feature typically involves leaving “comments,” although sites employ various labels for this feature. In addition, social networks often have a private messaging feature similar to webmail. While both private messages and comments are popular on most of the major networking sites, they are not universally available.

Beyond profiles, Friends, comments, and private messaging, network sites vary greatly in their features and user base. Some have photo-sharing or video-sharing capabilities; others have built-in blogging and instant messaging technology. There are mobile-specific social network sites (e.g., Dodgeball), but some web-based sites also support limited mobile interactions (e.g., Facebook, MySpace, and Cyworld). Many networking sites target people from specific geographical regions or linguistic groups, although this does not always determine the site’s consistency. Orkut, for example, was launched in the United States with an English-only interface, but Portuguese-speaking Brazilians quickly became the dominant user group (Kopytoff, 2004). Some sites are designed with specific ethnic, religious, sexual orientation, political, or other identity-driven categories in mind. There are even sites for dogs (Dogster) and cats (Catster), although their owners must manage their profiles. This then brings to mind the fact that everyone needs to interact both humans and animals alike.

1.2 Statement of the Problem

The introduction of information technology in Nigeria is a welcome development. The use of internet for educational purposes is also of immense benefit especially in the area of being globally relevant and current. However, when it becomes a substitute for good means of social interactions and academic study among young people, it should give cause for concern.

Students nowadays spend the better part of their time in school on information technology devices such as palmtops, iPods and blackberry. On close enquiry, one usually finds out that they are social networking with friends and rarely getting information on their various school courses. Often times, information sought is subject to the use of technological media especially for pleasure, to while away time and to interrelate with friends and pals on Facebook, twitter e.t.c. The question this research seeks to answer is; how has social networking influenced students with regards to their academic performance?

1.3 Objectives of the Study

  1. To determine the influence of social networking on the academic performance of Caritas University Students.
  2. To ascertain the amount of time students spend on social networking sites.
  3. To determine the impact of social networking on the grade points of students of Caritas University.

1.4 Research Questions

  1. How has social networking influenced the academic performance of Caritas University students?
  2. How much time do students of Caritas University spend on social networking sites?
  3. How has social networking impacted on the grade points of Caritas University students?

1.5 Scope of the Study

A particular focus is given to the academic behaviour of emerging university students. An overview was provided of the recent transformation of institutions into providers of information Centres. This also seems to have taken a negative impact on reading habits and social interaction as they would rather listen to people talk on YouTube and chat with friends on Facebook, Twitter e.t.c. so they do not feel the need to read any longer. The study is centred on the students of Caritas University. This research seeks to show how social networking influences the academic performance of Caritas University students.

1.6 Significance of the Study

This study will help students to discover how much social networking influences their academic performance; it will also enlighten academic personnel on both the good and bad aspects of social networking to ensure academic growth for their students. The study will benefit students in their usage of these networking sites and also institutions to create a more conducive environment for learning.

1.7 Operational Definition of Terms


Is a collection of computers and computer networks located all over the world, all of which share information by agreed upon protocols.

Social Networking Service

This is an online site that focuses on facilitating the building of social networks or social relations among people who share activities, interests, background thus allowing them share ideas, events among themselves.

Academic Performance

Refers to how students deal with their studies and how they cope with or accomplish different tasks given to them by their teachers.


A person who studies at a school, college or university.

Chapter Five

Summary, Recommendation and Conclusion

5.1 Introduction

This chapter is focused on the summary of findings, recommendation for further studies and conclusion on the study, influence of social networking on the academic performance of Caritas University students.

5.2 Summary of Findings

The aim of this study is to determine the influence social networking has on the academic performance of Caritas university students, to ascertain the amount of time spent on these social networking sites and finally to determine the impact this sites has on the grade points of Caritas University students. The research design used in the study was survey research design or method, this method was used because the design was considered most relevant as it gives the researcher a chance to make references and generations of the population by studying the sample obtained from the study, the selection of the sample size was carried out through the simple random sampling technique. This was to give equal opportunity to all the members of the population area to be selected for the study.

The main instruments used for data collection were the questionnaire designed by the researcher with the help of the supervisor. The use of simple tables and percentages was employed to analyse and present the data gotten from the field to give answers to the study. This statistical technique was considered most appropriate because of the nature of the variables involved. The result of the analysis indicated that social networking sites influence the academic performance of Caritas University students negatively as it draws their attention away from their academic studies and makes them spend a lot of time on these sites and not on their studies.

5.3 Conclusion

Based on the findings of the study the following conclusions were reached; the research study has shown that constant exposure to social networking sites draws away one‘s attention from things that are relevant e.g. academic studies. It can seen from that data gotten that 93.75% majority of students are on different social networking sites and only 6.25% are not on any, this goes to show that almost all the students are on these sites and must go online at one point or the other rather than study their books or doing academic works. In a school week only a few number of people attend classes for the whole period set out for it, many of them attend within three – two days only.

Most students spend less time on their academic work and more time on social networking sites, this goes to show that the interest of these students lie not on things concerning their academics but on the things they see or do on these sites. These sites most times can be seen by the students as an escape from the dull walls of the classroom, into a whole new world where boundaries do not apply. Respondents would rather be on social networking sites, watch movies, rest than read their books in their free time.

These social networking sites also tend to affect grade points of the students as only 12.5% – 15.625% had excellent grades – good grades and the majority had fair and poor grades.

The influence these sites have on the students‘ academic performance cannot be over emphasised, it negatively influences the students as it turns away their attention from their studies to the entertainment these sites provide.

5.3 Recommendations

The researcher made the following recommendations:

  1. That new and creative method of teaching should be used in classrooms to ensure the attention of students who see the wall of lecture halls as a prison or cage.
  2. The use of social networking sites should be implemented as a tool for learning in
  3. Lecturers should integrate social media into their classrooms, to remind students of assignments, refer them to sources and connect them with their classmates.
  4. Academic counsellors can also consider assessing college students‘ media use and encouraging them to take breaks from media, particularly in class, studying or completing assignments.
  5. The use of social networking sites that are centered on academic life rather than strictly social life can be implemented.

5.4 Suggestion for Further Studies

The researcher suggests that further studies should be done on the study ―Influence of Social Networking on the Academic Performance of Caritas University Students‖. Researchers who want to embark on this project should also try to determine the negative and positive influences of social networking.

Project Material Download

5,000 5000

The Complete Material Will Be Sent to You in Just 2 Steps

Quick & Simple…

Step One Purchase

Make Payment (Through Transfer) of ₦5,000 to Any of the Account Below

Access Bank PlcAcc No: 0811003731
Samphina Academy
Current Account
Zenith BankAcc No: 1225513212
Samphina Academy
Current Account

Or CLICK HERE To Pay With Debit Card

CLICK HERE To Purchase Material ($15)
Make Payment of 120 GHS to 0553978005 | Douglas Cloud Osabutey | MTN MoMo

Step Two Purchase

Send the Following Details on WhatsApp ( 08143831497) After Payment

  1. Payment Details

  2. TOPIC: Influence Of Social Networking On The Academic Performance Of Caritas University Students

The Complete Material Will Be Sent To You On WhatsApp After Receiving Your Details
T & C Apply

  Contact Our Help Desk

Need a Different Topic? Perform a Quick Search

List of Related Works

Click on Any Topic to Preview the Content

Samphina Academy

Samphina Academy is an Online Educational Resource Center that is aimed at providing students with quality information and materials to aid them in succeeding in their academic pursuit.