Impact Of The Adoption Of IPSAS On The Accountability Of Public Fund In Nigeria
This study evaluated the impact of International Public Sector Accounting Standard (IPSAS) on the accountability of public fund in Nigeria which results in reliability, credibility and integrity of financial reporting in public sector organization in Nigeria. The purpose of this study is to ascertain the impact of IPSAS on reliability, credibility, and integrity of financial reporting. The findings or result of the study showed that the implementation or adoption of IPSAS will improve the reliability, credibility and integrity of financial reporting in federal Government administration in Nigeria. Also, it was observed that implementation of IPSAS based standards can facilitate efficient internal control and result based financial management in the public sector of Nigeria. Equally, it was found that implementation of IPSAS can enhance Federal Government’s goal to significantly deliver services more effectively and efficiently
The International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB) develops accounting standards for public sector entities referred to as International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSASs). The IPSASB is among the four independent standard-setting boards of International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contribution to the development of strong international economies. It was founded in 1977; IFAC is comprised of 173 members and as-societies in 129 countries and jurisdictions which include Nigeria.
IFAC is expected to serve the public interest by:
- Con-attributing to the development, adoption and implementation of high quality international standards and guidance;
- Contributing to the development of strong professional accountants;
- Promoting the value of professional accountants;
- Speaking out on accounting public issues.
The IPSAB an independent standard-setting organ of IFAC responsible for developing accounting standards for public sector entities is focused on ensuring consistent and comparable financial information across jurisdiction. The IPSASB recognizes the significant benefits of achieving consistent and comparable financial in-formation across jurisdictions and it believes that the IPSASs will play a key role in enabling these benefits to be realized. The IPSASB issues IPSASs dealing with financial reporting under the cash basis of accounting and the accrual basis of accounting. The accrual IPSASs are based on the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs), issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), where the requirements of those Standards are applicable to the public sector. They also deal with public sector specific financial re-porting issues that are not dealt with in IFRSs. IPSAS refers to the recommendations made by the IPSAS Board under the auspices of the International Federation of Accountants.
IPSASB strongly encourages governments and national standard-setters to engage in the development of its standards by commenting on the proposals set out in its exposure drafts and consultation papers. The members of the IPSASB are appointed by the IFAC Board. The IPSASB comprises a total of 18 members, 15 of whom are nominated by member or organizations of the IFAC. The other three are public members and can be nominated by any individual or organization. The countries represented on the IPSASB include: Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, Japan, Kenya, Morocco, New Zealand, Pakistan, Romania, South Africa, United Kingdom, United States of America and Uruguay . IPSAS are accepted for accounting for funds provided under World Bank Programs. Developing countries are urged to adopt IPSAS by international organizations which provide financial assistance to developing countries. Other countries, regardless of their political and economic systems, are encouraged to harmonize their national standards with IPSAS. Thus, IPSAS have become de factointernational benchmarks for evaluating Government accounting practices worldwide. For these reasons, IPSAS deserves the attention of accounting policy-makers, practitioners and scholars alike, . IPSAS seeks to improve the quality of general purpose financial reporting by public sector entities, leading to better informed assessments of the resource allocation decisions made by governments, thereby increasing transparency and accountability. IPSAS can be applied by national, state and local governments as well as related government entities.
The adoption of IPSAS by Governments is expected to improve both the quality and comparability of financial information reported by public sector entities around the world. The IPSASB recognizes the right of Governments and national standard-setters to establish accounting standards and guidelines for financial reporting in their jurisdictions. Public sector can be described as entities or organizations that implement public policy through the provision of ser-vices and the redistribution of income and wealth, with both activities supported mainly by compulsory tax or levies on other sectors. This comprises governments and all publicly owned, controlled and or publicly funded agencies, enterprises, and other entities of government that deliver public programs, goods, or services . However, IPSASs do not apply to government business enterprises.
A government business enterprise within the meaning of IPSASs is an entity that has the following characteristics:
- It is an entity with the power to contract in its own name;
- It has been assigned the financial and operational authority to carry on a business;
- It sells goods and services, in the normal course of its business, to other entities at profit or full cost recovery;
- It is not reliant on continuing government funding to be a good concern (other than purchase of outputs at arm’s length) and
- It is controlled by a public sector entity.
The IPSASB develops IPSASs for financial statements prepared on the accrual basis of accounting as well as for financial statements prepared on the cash basis of accounting. IPSASs govern the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure requirements in relation to transactions and events in general purpose financial statement. Such financial statements are characterized by the fact that they are issued for users who are unable to demand financial information to enable them meet their specific information needs. Public sector accounting is a system or process which gathers, records, classifies and summarizes as reports the financial events existing in the public or government sector as financial statements and interprets as required by accountability and financial transparency to provide information to information users associated to public institutions. It is interested in the receipts, custody and disbursement and rendering of stewardship of public funds en-trusted, . Government accounting refers to a government’s financial information systems and financial disclosure practices. Its state of development results from the interaction between the supply of and demand for Government financial accountability and transparency. Since it is costly everywhere to produce and disseminate information, Governments in all types of political systems lack the economic incentives to do so.
However, some political systems exert a greater demand for government accountability and transparency than others; for example, representative democracies are more demanding than authoritarian and totalitarian political systems. In a democracy, the government is obliged to be more responsive to information demands placed upon it. This would be the case in developed countries and developing countries alike. However, the opportunity cost of resources used in improving government financial information is higher in developing countries than in developed countries. Therefore, even if Governments in democratic developing countries are willing to undertake government accounting reform, they may be unable to afford it; Governments in non-democratic developing countries are both reluctant to undertake and unable to afford Government accounting reforms. Local accounting standards in Nigeria were set under the Nigerian Accounting Standards Board Act of 2003 by the Nigerian Accounting Standards Board (NASB). Originally established in 1982 as a private sector initiative housed in the Institute of Chartered Accountant of Nigeria (ICAN), Nigerian Accounting Standards Board became a government agency in 1992 and reports to the Federal Ministry of Commerce. Its membership includes representatives of Government and relevant interests groups. The primary role of the Board is to ensure that published financial statements are uniform in content and in format and communicate precisely what they purport to convey. Timely, clear and open annual financial statements play a significant role in the accountability of governments to their citizens and their elected representatives. These financial statements are prepared on a cash basis or some variation of an accrual basis of accounting.
However, most of these financial statements are not prepared on a consistent or comparable basis in developing countries. The benefits of achieving consistent and comparable financial in-formation across jurisdictions are very important and a set of International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) have been established by the IPSAS Board to assist in that Endeavour, . In addition, , reported that basically, a country’s accounting and disclosure system is part of its financial system and more generally its institutional infrastructure. This is geared towards the informational and contracting needs of the key parties in the economy and its role in corporate governance and the capital market. Since the accounting system is complementary to other elements in the institutional frame-work, a fit between them is likely what results in different ac-counting system and infrastructural regimes across countries. The concerns for harmonization of accounting standards and later, convergence in the 1990s with International Reporting Standards are due to the globalization of the capital markets. In fact, it is believed that accounting harmonization is necessary for the globalization of capital markets, . According to , the major assumptions of IPSASs are:
- There are so many common transactions in the private and public sectors that it is possible, and indeed pre-farmable to have one set of generally accepted accounting principles for both sectors. Most IPSASs can there-fore be set by making modest changes to the standards promulgated by the international (Business) Ac-counting Standard Board (IASB). Additionally, the IP-SASs Board would establish standards for transactions and events unique to the public sector.
- Since business firms annually prepare consolidated financial statement under the accrual basis, it is expected that governments should do the same. Consolidated financial statements cover a primary organization and its subsidiaries in which the primary organization has a majority ownership interest. The accrual basis used by business firms regards sale (not production) of goods and services as the criterion for judging financial performance.
- Accounting standards are more objective and of a higher quality if they are set by an expert group inde-pendent of the organizations, obliged to follow the standards. For the public sector, independence can be achieved or at least enhanced by giving the task to a private sector body, an advisory board, or increase the number of public (non-government) members.
- Accounting standard should be produced through due process. Due process means that research and deliberation should precede decisions. Furthermore, adequate opportunities are provided for interested parties to provide input before standards are finalized.
1.2 Statement Of The Problem
The slow implementation of IPSAS since it was adopted in Nigeria in 2010 may imply nonconformity with the trend in globalisation. It also portrays noncompliance with IFAC public sector reform strategy as it relates to IPSAS. IPSAS reform is about transparency and accountability in the management of public resources. This problem of slow implementation can cause the nation to be less attractive to foreign direct investment because of poor transparency in the affairs of government, lack of comparison of financial reports of home and foreign operations due to different reporting format. Donor agencies and other funding agencies may not be attracted to Nigeria since it is slow in complying with the new public management reforms as established by the IFAC which is the global umbrella body of accountancy, to the detriment of a nation with poor transparency perception index. Transparency International (2016) corruption perception index ranks Nigeria 136th out of 176 countries surveyed. Also United Nations economic commission for Africa (2015) finds that there are illicit monies with some Nigerians. Some factors have been identified by scholars to have contributed to the slow implementation of IPSAS. These factors have been identified to include cultural, expertise, political-buy- in and accountability. For instance, the literature has identified political buy-in of top government at the different levels of governance as an issue of concern in the implementation of IPSASs (Atuilik, Adafula, and Asare, 2016; Tikk, 2010 and Tickell, 2010). Ijeoma and Oghoghomeh (2014), Aboagye (nd). Nurunnabi (2012) joined the debate on the implementation of IPSASs and argue that there is the problem of Sociological factors. Omolehinwa and Naiyeju (2015) and Hamisi (2012) identifies the cost of implementation as a problem. Accountability is a factor affecting the implementation of IPSAS (Alshujairi, (2014).
1.3 Objective Of The Study
The objectives of the study are;
- To ascertain the impact of IPSAS on the accountability of public fund in Nigeria
- To ascertain the effectiveness of IPSAS to Nigeria government
- To ascertain the relationship between IPSAS and public fund accountability
1.4 Research Hypotheses
For the successful completion of the study, the following research hypotheses were formulated by the researcher;
- H0: there is no impact of IPSAS on the accountability of public fund in Nigeria
H1: there is impact of IPSAS on the accountability of public fund in Nigeria
- H02: there is no effectiveness of IPSAS to Nigeria government
H2: there is effectiveness of IPSAS to Nigeria government
1.5 Significance Of The Study
The findings of this study are to restore the hope of citizens considering improved government role playing in peoples’ welfare. The study is of benefit to the society because it will promote transparency and accountability as a life changing approach to governance. The study will also serve as reference to other researchers who will embark on this study.
1.6 Scope And Limitation Of The Study
The scope of the study covers impact of the adoption of IPSAS on the accountability of public fund in Nigeria. The researcher encounters some constrain which limited the scope of the study;
a) Availability Of Research Material:
The research material available to the researcher is insufficient, thereby limiting the study
The time frame allocated to the study does not enhance wider coverage as the researcher has to combine other academic activities and examinations with the study.
c) Organizational Privacy:
Limited Access to the selected auditing firm makes it difficult to get all the necessary and required information concerning the activities
1.7 Definition Of Terms
Adoption is a process whereby a person assumes the parenting of another, usually a child, from that person’s biological or legal parent or parents, and, in so doing, permanently transfers all rights
The International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board® (IPSASB) works to improve public sector financial reporting worldwide through the development of IPSAS, international accrual-based accounting standards, for use by governments and other public sector entities around the world.
In leadership roles, accountability is the acknowledgment and assumption of responsibility for actions, products, decisions, and policies including the administration, governance, and implementation within the scope of the role or employment position and encompassing the obligation to report, explain and be answerable
Money that is generated by the government to provide goods and services to the general public.
1.8 Organization Of The Study
This research work is organized in five chapters, for easy understanding, as follows
- Chapter one is concern with the introduction, which consist of the (overview, of the study), historical background, statement of problem, objectives of the study, research hypotheses, significance of the study, scope and limitation of the study, definition of terms and historical background of the study.
- Chapter two highlights the theoretical framework on which the study is based, thus the review of related literature.
- Chapter three deals on the research design and methodology adopted in the study.
- Chapter four concentrate on the data collection and analysis and presentation of finding.
- Chapter five gives summary, conclusion, and recommendations made of the study
Summary, Conclusion And Recommendation
It is important to ascertain that the objective of this study was to ascertain impact of the adoption of IPSAS on the accountability of public fund in Nigeria
In the preceding chapter, the relevant data collected for this study were presented, critically analyzed and appropriate interpretation given. In this chapter, certain recommendations made which in the opinion of the researcher will be of benefits in addressing the challenges of adoption of IPSAS on the accountability of public fund in Nigeria
This study was on impact of the adoption of IPSAS on the accountability of public fund in Nigeria. Three objectives were raised which included: To ascertain the impact of IPSAS on the accountability of public fund in Nigeria, to ascertain the effectiveness of IPSAS to Nigeria government, to ascertain the relationship between IPSAS and public fund accountability. In line with these objectives, two research hypotheses were formulated and two null hypotheses were posited. The total population for the study is 200 staff from the office of the accountant general of the federation. The researcher used questionnaires as the instrument for the data collection. Descriptive Survey research design was adopted for this study. A total of 133 respondents made up senior auditors, principal auditors, auditor grade i and auditors grade ii were used for the study. The data collected were presented in tables and analyzed using simple percentages and frequencies
This study examined the expectations and benefits of adoption of International Public Sector Accounting Standards in Nigeria. Nigeria is expected to adopt the International Public Sector Accounting Standards in 2014. Sequel to Nigeria’s implementation and adoption of this accounting standard, the present study examined possible benefits of adopting the system. From the findings of the study, it was observed that adoption of IPSAS is expected to increase the level of accountability and transparency in public sector of Nigeria. It was found that the adoption of IPSAS will enhance comparability and international best practices. Also, it was denoted that adoption of IPSAS based standards will enable the provision of more meaningful information for decision makers and improve the quality of financial reporting system in Nigeria. In addition, it was denoted that adoption of IPSAS by Nigerian government will improve comparability of financial information reported by public sector entities in Nigeria and around the world. Hence, we conclude that the adoption of IPSAS in Nigeria is expected to impact operating procedures, reporting practices and hence strengthen good governance and relations with the government and the governed.
In essence, from the result and findings of the present study, the researcher recommends:
- That government should engage professionals to drive the process and also involve external professionals to leverage best practices;
- Due to the challenges of availability of electricity and internet services especially in the rural areas hosting majority of local governments, we recommend for a start and centralization of the operations in terms of record keeping at the state capitals;
- Finally, since the benefits of IPSAS adoption cannot be quantified as argued in the present study, the researcher recommends the adoption of International Public Sector Accounting Standards in Nigeria.
The Complete Material Will Be Sent to You in Just 2 Steps
Quick & Simple…
Make Payment (Through Transfer) of ₦3,000 to Any of the Account Below
|Acc No: 0811003731|
|Acc No: 1225513212|
|Acc No: 8143831497|
Or CLICK HERE To Pay With Debit Card
|FOR STUDENTS OUTSIDE NIGERIA|
|CLICK HERE To Purchase Material ($15)|
|FOR GHANIAN STUDENTS|
|Make Payment of 80 GHS to 0553978005 | Douglas Osabutey | MTN MoMo|
Send the Following Details on WhatsApp ( 08143831497) After Payment
- Payment Details
- TOPIC: Impact Of The Adoption Of IPSAS On The Accountability Of Public Fund In Nigeria
The Complete Material Will Be Sent To You On WhatsApp After Receiving Your Details
T & C Apply