A Geographic Information System GIS Assessment Of Urban Sprawl
In Nigeria, the urban sprawl debate has closely paralleled urban growth trends over the past few decades. Many studies indicate that it is the pattern, density, and rate of new urban growth that create the appearance of sprawl. Population dynamics are often cited as a driving force behind urban sprawl. This thesis uses Geographic Information Systems (GIS) mapping and land cover change analysis, neighborhood statistics, community surveying, key-informant interviews with planners and developers, and planning documents to measure sprawl. The study area includes the jurisdictions that comprise the Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) of Lekki of Lagos. Urban land cover increased by one-fourth, from approximately 559 square kilometers to approximately 746 square kilometers from 1992 to 2001.
This study analyzes urban land cover data as well as interviews with local developers and planning documentation to understand development trends in Richmond from 1992 to 2001. These dates reflect the availability of National Land Cover Data (NLCD), which I reclassified in the GIS to show only those classes that represent urbanized land. I then compared the two years to show the level of urban growth over the nine year time period. Next, I analyze patterns of urban expansion by using mapping capabilities within the GIS and neighborhood statistics in order to show the density and connectivity of patches of new growth. Based on the density and connectivity of new growth areas, I classify patterns as one of three types of sprawl: linear along highways, cluster, and leapfrog.
My threshold densities are; 0 to 400 30 meter pixels per square kilometer for low density, 401 to 700 for medium density, and 701 to 1200 for high density. I also interviewed local developers and planners to gauge their opinions on the issue of urban sprawl versus urban growth. Developers do not see themselves as contributors to sprawl while planners see their roles as buffers between unfettered growth and market forces.
The results indicate that Lagos MSA did experience an increase in urban land from 1992 to 2001 and that urban growth in the study area can be classified as urban sprawl with the use of GIS mapping, neighborhood statistics, and analysis of jurisdictional planning documentation coupled with interviews with developers, land owners, and local planners. The density of new development is greatest in VIP and LEKKI, but the pattern and character with which development has occurred in Idomuta Lagos is synonymous with sprawl. Sprawl is also facilitated by inexpensive land with available infrastructure (water, sewer lines).
1.1 Background of Study
The Urban Sprawl Debate
As urban development takes place within Nigerian cities and around their fringes, urban sprawl or the lack thereof will continue to be a by-product of development practices and policies. Population increases and the consequences of unplanned urbanization are directly related to recent growth management practices that seek to influence the way in which built-up land can proliferate. The pattern, density, and rate at which built-up land develops are the basis for one contemporary debate: urban sprawl versus urban growth. As a contemporary planning issue, the debate over sprawl is framed by different disciplines and their understanding of how and why urban areas grow. Although urban sprawl is a type of urban growth, sprawl is dependent on the way in which development occurs.
Issues related to Urban Sprawl
Sprawl has been criticized for eliminating agricultural lands, spoiling water quality, and causing air pollution (Allen et al 2003). As population increases, so does the need for new housing, schools, and transportation networks. In the urban world today, industrial, commercial, and residential districts are markedly different from years past. Decentralization is a trend indicative of urban sprawl and present day industrial, commercial, and residential areas are no longer necessarily a part of the urban core (Nechyba et al 2004).
Rather, these types of development are often found in low-density areas that are separated from the major urban area by large tracts of homogeneous land. Hence, the needs for larger transportation networks and in turn a greater dependency on automobiles, which produce more air pollution. As new roads are put in place, precious farmland is often left unprotected from commercial or residential developers (Hathout 2002). The greater the imperviousness of an area the more water runoff one can expect, which is the catapult for water pollution (Wilson et al 2003). Without regulations on urban growth, consequences of urban sprawl are likely to continue.
Visualizing Urban Sprawl
Before the introduction of Geographic Information Systems, mapping any phenomenon took an extremely long time. Maps produced through manual cartography for comparison were planned well in advance of a due date. Computer aided maps without GIS were very rudimentary and were not very aesthetically pleasing to say the least. The availability of different types of spatial data allows a GIS user to map virtually any phenomena with a geographic dimension applied to it. In addition, large amounts of data are processed before the creation of a map with much less work than with manual cartographic techniques. With a GIS, maps can be compared in a fraction of the time and can be done at variable scales with ease.
The use of Geographic Information Systems modeling has become quite prevalent within the field of urban sprawl research. Some research on urban sprawl uses GIS as a tool in understanding the effects of urban sprawl on the natural environment. GIS reveals spatial patterns of urban sprawl by measuring distances of new urban growth areas from town centers and roads for example (Gar-On Yeh et al 2001). Because urban development is irreversible, GIS simulates future land development (Lee et al 1998). A Geographic Information System is a decision support system that can facilitate urban planning.
Because there is a lack of a universal definition of urban sprawl, a map of urban or built land is an adequate starting point in studying urbanization. A map provides the visual aspect from which studies on urban sprawl can begin in relation to urban growth. A Geographic Information System is useful for mapping the spatial distribution of urban areas. Unlike traditional cartographic methods, GIS allows for the manipulation of different types of data in one map frame. Mapping urban phenomena is a crucial part of quantifying urban sprawl. While many layers of data are used to create a map of urban growth, ultimately it is the map that tells the story about the level of urban sprawl over a given landscape. This type of mapping involves a temporal signature in which two or more time periods are used for comparing amounts of urbanization. One base map shows urban or built-up land in a starting year and another map shows the developed land from the end year. Therefore, mapping the extent of urbanization over a given period of time is an essential part of understanding urban sprawl.
The Distinction between Growth and Sprawl
As urban growth occurs, that growth is often confused with urban sprawl. However, there is a distinction between urban growth and urban sprawl. Cities often experience growth either physically, by population, or by a combination of both. Urban sprawl is much more complicated because it may or may not qualify as urban growth. How a city grows can create the appearance of sprawl. Such urban growth may appear as a low-density leapfrog pattern, a linear or strip development pattern along highways, or a tightly condensed pattern of new development around pre-existing built-up landscapes (Nechyba et al 2004). Without urban growth there would be no appearance of urban sprawl.
The patterns represented by sprawling landscapes are aligned with the definition of the word sprawl. If I lay out on the floor in an awkward way, I am sprawling out. This idea coupled with urban development gives a good visualization of what urban sprawl may look like. A formal entry reads this way: “Sprawl v. sit or spread out in a relaxed or awkward way – n. sprawling position” (Goldman, 1993, p. 279). This definition coupled with the phrase urban growth is one example of the difference between simple growth and urban sprawl. Urban growth may have more of a planned appearance while the pattern of sprawl often appears awkward, uncontrolled, and haphazard. Perhaps there is a new development very similar to an urban landscape in the middle of a seemingly rural area broken up by many other rural landscapes such as farmland or forested areas. Perhaps the timing of this development closely follows the completion of a new road network or major highway.
The debate over urban sprawl is relatively new, yet there are many definitions of urban sprawl. This is due in large part because there is no consensus on what sprawl is and what is simply urban growth. Despite vivid examples of what some may classify as sprawl over a given landscape, there is no clear definition of urban sprawl that is shared by all who study urban phenomena. There are definitions based on characteristics of urban sprawl, effects of urban sprawl, and factors leading to urban sprawl. Further, definitions of urban sprawl are also influenced by the people that create them. Many definitions of urban sprawl may include bias towards being pro or con urban development.
It is important to note a few of the definitions from different time periods. Here I will present those definitions in a chronological manner in order to show a progression in the concept of urban sprawl. Ottensmann (1977, 389) defines urban sprawl as “the scattering of new developments on isolated tracts, separated from other areas by vacant land.” Ewing (1997, 108) characterizes urban sprawl as “leapfrog land use patterns, strip commercial development along highways, and very low-density single-use developments.” Zhang (2001, 221) states that “urban sprawl results from poorly planned, large scale new residential, commercial and industrial developments in areas previously not used for urban purposes.”
For the purposes of my research, I will use a combination of all of the previous three definitions in my conceptualization of urban sprawl. In operationalizing sprawl, I will use many of the techniques found in the literature review section of this paper. I will begin operationalization by isolating only urban land within the GIS for 1992 and 2001. I will incorporate road data at this point. Then, I will use neighborhood statistics to measure the density and connectivity of new patches of urban growth. After quantifying how dense and connected patches of new growth are, I will classify those new growth areas as one of three types of sprawl: linear along highways, cluster, or leapfrog. I will also incorporate responses to interview questions from developers, land owners, and local planners and analysis of planning documentation to gauge opinions and perceptions of sprawl as well as planning practices.
1.2 Statement of Problem
Urban sprawl is one of the foremost threat facing agricultural lands in Nigeria (Nwafor, 2006). Sprawl has been criticized for eliminating agricultural lands, spoiling water quality, and causing air pollution. Other frequently mentioned consequences are: green space consumption, high costs of infrastructure and energy, an increasing social segregation and land use functional division. Furthermore, the need to travel, dependence on private car and consequently increased traffic congestion, energy consumption and polluting emissions are associated with sprawl (Allen & Lu, 2003).
Siedentrop (1998) identified the impacts of sprawl as ecological impacts, building and sealing of land, as well as indirectly loss of natural potential of soils and the expulsion of endangered animal and plants. Social and health impacts, Sprawl leads to an erosion of functioning urban cores. This has not only social and infrastructural consequences, but also impacts on innovation capacity of regional economies (Cervero, 2000). There is a significant connection between broadening of settlements and concentration of poverty in city cores. The degree of social interaction in sprawled areas has decreased (Putnam, 1994).
Experienced change in land use right from its inception as a State from 1996, as a results of development which resulted to the loss of vegetation, cultivated lands and forest reserve, loss of biodiversity and various erosional activities. So, there is need to conduct such a research in order to analyze the rate and pattern of the urban sprawl resulting from the development. To the best of the researcher‟s knowledge, no study has been carried out on the analysis of urban sprawl using Remote Sensing and GIS in the study area. Hence the need for this study. This is the knowledge gap this research intended to fill.
1.3 Research Objectives
The aim of this research is to assess urban sprawl in Lekki, Lagos, between 1992 and 2001 using Geographic Information System.
The specific objectives are to:
- Determine the extent of urban land use in 1992, 1998 and 2001
- Assess the extent of urban sprawl between 1992, 1998 and 2001; and
- Estimate the rate and pattern of urban sprawl in the study area.
1.4 Research Question
- What is the extent of urban land use in 1992, 1998 and 2001?
- What is the extent of urban sprawl in Lekki, Lagos between 1992, 1998 and 2001?
- What is the rate and pattern of urban sprawl in Lekki, Lagos between 1992, 1998 and 2001?
1.5 Scope and Limitation of the Study
The focus of this study is to assess urban sprawl in Lekki, Lagos, using GIS. The study will cover the period between 1992 and 2001. The study intends to determine the extent, rate and pattern of urban sprawl in the area.
1.6 Significance of Study
For local governments it is interesting to have exact information about the extent of the urban area, how is the land currently used and the urban growth (the direction) (Jatet al., 2008). This kind of information is needed for the urban planning of fast changing regions, to make sustainable and smart decisions (Heroldet al., 2002).
Since land use changes have indirect consequences on national economic growth, it is important to evaluate land use changes in the regional and the local context in order to assist in anticipating the impacts associated with change and contribute to an understanding of productive environmental sustainability (Laymon, 2003). This study will come out with the rate at which the city is growing.
Urban growth is widely regarded as an important driver of environmental and social problems. It causes the loss of informal open space and the fragmentation of wildlife habitats. Timely and accurate assessments of future urban growth scenarios and associated environmental impacts are crucial for urban planning, policy decision, and natural resource management. Lagos and its environs have been experiencing explosive growth recently due to the continuous urban development and as a result of rural-urban migration. This study will provide planners and decision makers in the study area with the necessary information required for proper planning, development and management of the area for sustainable growth and development.
Summary, Conclusion and Recommendations
5.1 Summary of Findings
Lekki, Lagos became a major settlement in Lagos state in 1996. As a result there was an influx of people from other part of the state and the country mounting pressure on the land for development purposes. Since then the area had been growing spatially to the detriment of other land cover types like vegetation and agricultural land.The aim of this research is to analyse urban sprawl in Lekki, Lagos between 1992 and 2001 using Geographic Information System and Remote Sensing techniques
The study explored urban sprawl in terms of the spatial extent of urban land use, spatial extent of urban sprawl and, the rate and pattern of urban sprawl in the study area between 1992 and 2001.It was found that urban land use occupied: 12.78km² (13.55%); 33.02km² (35.01%) and; 48.49km² (51.43%) in 1992, 1998 and 2001 respectively. The spatial extent of urban sprawl was found to be: 1.45km² (11.30%); 1.72km² (5.21%) and; 1.55km² (12.15%) between: 1992 and 1998, 1998 and 2001 and, 1992 and 2001 respectively. High annual rates rate of urban sprawl of 1.45km² (11.31%), 1.72km² (5.21%), 1.55km² (12.15%) were witnessed between 1992 and 1998, 1998 and 1992 and 2001 respectively.
This research work demonstrates the ability of Geographic Information System in the analysis of urban sprawl. The results obtained from this study revealed that there has been a continuous increase in build-up areas throughout the study period. There has also been a progressive increase of urban sprawl both in terms of spatial extent and annual rate throughout the study period. The period of between 1998 and 2001 had the highest rate of urban sprawl which could be attributed to the fact that it was the period within which the state was created and the study area being the seat of the state government served as the population pull factor to the study area.
Owing to the continual increase in urban sprawl in both extent and the rate in the study area, the following are recommended:
- There is need for a regular monitoring of urban sprawl and development by the state Government in the study area especially with the aid of Geographic Information System for better decision making.
- There is need for all stakeholders like Ministry of Land and Survey, Ministry of Environment, State Development Board and NGOs in urban land use management to ensure strict adherence to urban land use legislations.
- There is a need for a regular appraisal by the state government on analysis of urban dynamics and development using Geographic Informatic System so as to easily detect areas that are fast growing and need attention in the study area.
- Government should encourage researchers to further carry out urban-related studies with socio-economic effect in the study area for a more in-depth understanding of the dynamics of urbanization.
How To Get The Complete Material For A Geographic Information System GIS Assessment Of Urban Sprawl
The Complete Material will be Sent to You in Just 2 Steps
Quick & Simple…
Make a Mobile Transfer or POS Payment of ₦3,000 to any of the Account Below
|Account No.: 0811003731|
|Name: Samphina Academy|
|Account Type: Current|
|Account No.: 1225513212|
|Name: Samphina Academy|
|Account Type: Current|
Or CLICK HERE To Pay With Debit Card
|FOR CLIENTS OUTSIDE NIGERIA|
|CLICK HERE To Pay With Debit Card ($15)|
|GHANA – Make Payment of 80 GHS to MTN MoMo, 0553978005, Douglas Osabutey|
Send the Following Details on WhatsApp ( 08143831497) After Payment
- Payment Details
- Email Address
- A Geographic Information System GIS Assessment Of Urban Sprawl
The Complete Material Will Be Sent To Your Email Address After Receiving Your Details
T & C Apply
This research material “A Geographic Information System GIS Assessment Of Urban Sprawl” is for research purposes and should be used as a guide in developing your research project / seminar work. For no reason should you copy word for word (verbatim) as samphina.com.ng will not be liable for any who copied the material.
The aim of providing this material is to reduce the stress of moving from one school library to another all in the name of searching for research materials. This service is legal because, all institutions permit their students to read previous projects, books, articles or papers while developing their own works. According to Austin Kleon “All creative work builds on what came before”.
samphina.com.ng is only providing this material “A Geographic Information System GIS Assessment Of Urban Sprawl” as a reference for your research. The paper should be used as a guide or framework for your own paper. The contents of this paper should be able to help you in generating new ideas and thoughts for your own research. Use it as a guidance purpose only.