Factors Influencing Juvenile Delinquencies Among Juvenile In Borstal Training Institute Ganmo, Kwara State.
This study investigated the factors influencing juvenile delinquencies among juveniles in Borstal Training Institute Ganmo, Kwara State.
A sample of 150 respondents were randomly selected. A questionnaire titled “Factor Influencing Juvenile Delinquencies Questionnaire (FIJDQ) was administered to elicit relevant information from the respondents and the data collected were analysed with the use of frequency counts, simple percentages, t-test and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).
The study revealed that parents not paying adequate attention to their children and lack of parental supervision or control; and exposure of children to drug use are the fundamental factors influencing juvenile delinquencies.
Based on these findings, it was recommended that multisystem therapy (MST) could be adopted. MST is a family – oriented home based program targeting chronically violent, substance – abusing juvenile offenders aged 12 to 17. also, counsellors should be employed in remand or juvenile homes for enhanced and functional guidance and counselling activities aimed at rehabilitating and reforming the delinquent juveniles.
Table of Contents
- Title Page
- Approval Page
- Table of Contents
- List of Tables
- Background to the Study
- Statement of the Problem
- Research Questions
- Research Hypotheses
- Purpose of the Study
- Significance of the Study
- Operational Definition of Terms
- Scope of the Study
Review of Related Literature
- Concept of Juvenile Delinquency
- Factors Influencing Juvenile Delinquency
- Psychological Factors and Juvenile Delinquency
- Preventions of Juvenile Delinquency
- Summary of the Review of Related Literature
- Research Design
- Sample and Sampling Procedure
- Psychometric Property of the Instrument Validity
- Procedure for Data Collection
- Procedure for Scoring the Instrument
- Method of Data Analysis
- Demographic Data
- Hypotheses Testing
- Summary of the Findings
Discussions, Conclusion and Recommendations
- Discussions of Findings
- Implications of the Findings
- Suggestions for Further Research
List of Tables
- Table 1: Distribution of Respondents by Gender, Age, Religion and Family type
- Table 2: Means and Rank Order of items on the factors influencing juvenile Delinquency
- Table 3: Mean, Standard Deviation and t-value of Respondents on factors influencing juvenile
delinquencies by respondents on the basis of gender
- Table 4: Mean, Standard Deviation and t-value of Respondents on the factors influencing delinquencies by respondents on the basis of age
- Table 5: ANOVA Result on the factors influencing Juvenile Delinquencies as Expressed by the Respondents on the basis of Religion
- Table 6: Mean, Standard Deviation and t-value of Respondents on the factors influencing delinquencies by respondents on the basis of Family type
Background to the Study
In our contemporary, societies, the problem of juvenile delinquency has been one of the malicious, negativistic acts of purposeless violence, which has turned out to be difficult to prevent and control. It has been observed that most delinquent acts which are serious and violent are committed by the juvenile or street gangs. These juveniles are involved in multiple, serious criminal acts. They maintain a criminal life-style; they are known to be repeat or chronic delinquent offenders (Siegel and Senna, 1991:6).
It should be emphasized that the trends of juvenile delinquency is difficult to establish on a daily, weekly, monthly, yearly or over a long period in our schools. This is because statistical records are not accurately kept in our schools. This makes it even more difficult to determine exactly, whether juvenile delinquency is on the increase or decrease during a certain period in our schools. Based on the national office of statistics, it is believed that juvenile delinquency rose astronomically at certain times during oil (1970 – 1979) and post – oil (1980 – 1989) era. The records of the Police Bureau also show that there was the greatest risk that students/pupils would be victims of serious offences than minor or simple offences committed by the delinquent students in the schools. Even teachers are not safe from their anti-social behaviour.
Emphatically, the problem of juvenile delinquency is a global phenomenon. Pathetically, on February 12 1993, 2 year old, James Bulger was abducted from a shopping mall in Liverpool, England, dragged half mile away to a construction site, beaten to death, and left on a rail road track to be run over by a train. His abductors were two 10 year – old boys whose actions were captured by mall security cameras (Siegel, 1995). Also, on January 11, 1992, four teenage girls lured 12 – year old Shanda Rence Sharer into there car, drove her down a country road where they tortured, sodomised, slashed and finally covered her with gasoline and burned her to death. One of the girls had accused Sharer of stealing away her girl friend in a homoerotic relationship. The crime occurred in Madison, Indiana, a quiet town of thirteen thousand people. The girls, who later plead guilty, were given the maximum sentence allowed by law (Siegel, 1995).
It is important to note here also that the anxiety and disquiet, induced by the juvenile is not limited to the modern era. Citing the code of Hammurabi which dates back to 2270 B.C., Regoli and Hewitt (1991:6) note that legal prohibition of specific behaviour by Juvenile is centuries old. Still, they note that in the middle ages “little distinctions were made between juveniles and adults who were older than 12 (Rogoli and Hewitt, 1991:6). In a comment made in 1959 but which is still relevant to those who are intrigued, frightened, or perplexed by the “heedlessness” of today juveniles.
Teeters and Matza (1959:200) stated: “it has always been popular for each generation to believe its children were the worst.” We are also reminded by them that Sir Walter Scott in 1812 deplored the insecurity of Edinburgh where group of boys between the ages of 12 down who robbed all who came in their way (p.200). Apropos of delinquency, such remarks underscore the relativity of opinion and the brevity of trends. They also remind us that juvenile delinquency is a relatively new legal category that subjects children to court authority; it is also a timeless and ubiquitous part of life.
By the mid – 1800s, teenage gangs were frequently found in the larger cities. The habits of hanging out on street corners, verbally abusing pedestrians, and even pelting citizens with rocks and snowballs were among the least threatening of their behaviours. More serious were the violent gangs of juvenile robbers. The latter decades of the 19th century saw a number of changes in the public understand of the causes of delinquency and of appropriate approaches to its control and treatment.
In America, children as young as three years of age could be brought before the court, while in England a girl of seven was hanged. In Massachusetts, in 1871, 1,354 boys and 109 girls were handled by the courts. Reform schools proliferated during the 19th century and were criticized for failing to prevent the apparent increase in delinquency. Reformers called “child savers” – believed that juveniles required non-instructional treatment that would reflect the natural family (Platt, 1969).
This legal and humanitarian concern for the well-being of children led to the establishment of the first juvenile court in Cook County Illinois, in 1899. By 1925, all but two states had followed the Illinois example. Thus, it seems fair to say that the idea of juvenile, delinquency is a relatively modern construction, a notion shared by writers such as Gibbons and Krohn (1991), Empey (1982), and Short (1990). The data on delinquency, however, are not limited to the legal status of juvenile delinquency, because counsellors are just as interested in unofficial as in official acts of delinquency.
Moreover, the gender debate on juvenile delinquency has concluded that the phenomenon does not vary by sex as male and female juveniles engage in delinquent acts. However, male rates in cases of juvenile delinquency are almost the same for the female, especially for sex offences, truancy and incorrigible conducts, but differ in other delinquent tendencies such as stealing and aggregated assault (Iwarimie – Jaja 1999:43).
Sequel from the above background information, this study will attempt to focus on the trends, patterns and factors responsible for juvenile delinquency. It will also show how socio-biological and psychological conditions can have expulsive effects on the child and make for engagement in delinquent activities. Furthermore, the essential purpose of this study is to reformulate and apply to our society the theoretical framework which writers who have studied juvenile delinquency have used. In this way, the study intend to adopt a holistic or multidisciplinary approach for the explanation of juvenile delinquency.
Statement of the Problem
The problem of juvenile delinquency has engaged the attention of various scholars especially in the developed countries. Without mincing words, juvenile delinquency has “calamitous effects” in our contemporary societies. Efforts to discover its causes/roots reveal that it is an endless effort to attribute its roots/causes to a single factor such as poverty, family environment, biochemical make-up, genetic factors to mention but a few.
The nature and scope of the juvenile delinquency vary from non-violent, to violent and from minor to serious offences. They include minor or single offences like cheating, fighting, lying, truancy and stealing to serious offences such as murder, arson, burglary, destruction of property and armed robbery. It also includes acts of drunkenness, alcoholism, prostitution, drug trafficking and peddling; fraudulent practices, bribery, corruption and counter feinting. For these acts of infringement, “the delinquent child is not tried under the criminal laws, but by the jurisdiction of the juvenile court which must do everything possible to help the child, because of the presumption that he/she is immature and lacks criminal intent (Iwarimie – Jaja, 1999:41).
There is no gain-saying the fact that delinquent juveniles are likely to graduate into adult criminals. Iwarimie – Jaja (1999) explains the link between juvenile delinquency and adult criminality. That is, to explain the process that are involved when a juvenile or a young person who has been involved in delinquency or has been associated with delinquent gangs or friends, and/or have been processed through the Nigerian Criminal Justice System and have continued to commit delinquency until he becomes an adult, or even stops his delinquent acts or association with delinquent or criminal friends, but suddenly begins to commit crime when he reaches adult age.
Studies by Wolfgang and his associates (1972) supported the linkage between juvenile delinquency and adult criminality. Wolfgang and his associates (1972) studied criminal careers of cohort boys (9,945) born in 1945 and followed their criminal activities until when they became 18 – year – old in 1963. From official police records in their Philadelphia study, they discovered that their sample contained 3,475 boys with police contact, 1862 delinquent youths were recidivists, 1,613 of them were first time offenders. 1,862 of them were first time offenders. 1,235 of them had been in police custody more than once but less than five, times, while 627 of them had been arrested five times or more. According to Wolfgang et.al 1972, the 627 delinquent recidivists with arrest record of five times or more account for 5,305 offences or 51% of all offences in the area. These offenders are identified as the chronic offender committed serious crimes; 69% of the aggravated assaults, 71% of the homicides, 73% of the rapes, and 83% of the robberies.
Wolfgang and associates in a second study (Birth Cohort II) used a larger sample of youths (males and females) born in Philadelphia in 1958. They found that the 1958 cohort of youths was significantly more involved in serious crime than the 1945 group, their violent offence rate is 149 per 1,000 in the sample (i.e. three times higher) than the rate for the 1945 group (which is 47per 1,000 subjects). However, the 1945 cohort study found that crime offenders dominate the total crime rate and continue their law violating career as adults.
Indeed, Iwarmie Jaja’s study (1999) shows also that juvenile recidivists are the ones that mature to become armed robbers. As he puts it:
No individual gets up one day and decides to rob a bank or a residence armed with a gun. This is because armed robbery is a high-level criminal act which criminals must graduate into commit either individually or in gang context (Iwanmie – Jaja, 1999: 72).
According to the developmental research of Moffilt (2006), there are two differences types of offenders that emerge in adolescence. One is the repeat offender, referred to as the life-course-persistent offender, who begins offending or showing anti-social/aggressive behaviour in adolescence (or even childhood) and continues into adulthood; and the age specific offender, referred to as the adolescence – limited offender, for whom juvenile offending or delinquency begins and ends during their period of adolescence. Because most teenagers tend to show some form of antisocial, aggressive or delinquent behaviour during adolescence.
According to Roberts (2013), failure in schools is the main risk factor of juvenile delinquency. Failure at school includes poor academic performance, poor attendance, or more likely, expulsion or dropping out of school.
According to him, this is an important factor for predicting future criminal behaviour. Leaving school early reduces the chance that juveniles will develop the social skills that are gained in school, such as learning to meet deadlines, following instructions and being able to deal constructively with their peers.
In addition, the growing incidence of child abuse and child neglect in the family tend to increase the probability of a child committing a criminal act (Roberts, 2012).
From the foregoing, it is clear that juvenile delinquency posed a serious threat to our society. Therefore, the fundamental concern of this study is to examine the causes and suggest lasting solutions to this threatening problem in our contemporary societies.
The study aims at finding answers to the following research questions:
- What are the factors influencing juvenile delinquencies?
- Is there any difference in the factor influencing juvenile delinquencies by respondents based on gender?
- Is there any difference in the factor influencing juvenile delinquencies by respondents based on age?
- Is there any difference in the factor influencing juvenile delinquencies by respondents based on family type?
- Is there any difference in the factor influencing juvenile delinquencies by respondents based on religion?
The following null hypotheses are generated for testing in this study:
- There is no significant difference in the factors influencing juvenile delinquencies by respondents on the basis of gender.
- There is no significant difference in the factors influencing juvenile delinquencies by respondents on the basis of age.
- There is no significant difference in the factors influencing juvenile delinquencies by respondents on the basis of family type.
- There is no significant difference in the factors influencing juvenile delinquencies by respondents on the basis of religion.
Purpose of the Study
It has been observed that the problem of juvenile delinquency has been one of the malicious, negativistic acts of purposeless violence which has turned out to be difficult to prevent and control in our school. Worst still, it has become a formidable cankerworm in our school. The purpose of this study, therefore, is to provide both quantitative and qualitative data on the factors influencing juvenile delinquency.
Specifically, the study will examine if variables: Age, Gender, Religion and Family type will have a significant difference on the factors influencing juvenile delinquency among respondents.
Significance of the Study
This empirical study is highly relevant because it will present both quantitative and qualitative data on the trends and patterns of juvenile delinquency in our schools. Also, the factors and consequences of the juvenile delinquency in our schools will be clearly reviewed in this empirical study.
Moreover, this study will examine the roles of counsellors in controlling and correcting the delinquent students in our schools. Recently people have understood and acknowledged the fundamental roles that the counsellors play in correcting the delinquent students by adopting psychotherapy method.
Furthermore, this empirical study is highly relevant because it will vividly analyse the effectiveness of juvenile courts and reform homes in the correction and rehabilitation of the delinquent juveniles. It will also examine the measures put in place by the government in the correction and rehabilitation of the delinquent children.
Subsequently, this study is highly relevant because it will recommend the policy – measures to solve the problems of juvenile delinquency. This makes this empirical study highly fundamental to our contemporary society. Also, this study will serve as a guide or frame of reference for other researchers who are interested in conducting a study on the same or related topics. In other words, the theoretical frameworks and methodologies that will be used in this study can be replicated in future studies.
Lastly, this study is theoretically, empirically and conceptually relevant. In other words, its concepts are rich and relevant or applicable to our schools.
Operational Definitions of Terms
The following terms are defined operationally as used in the study:
Delinquent is the term used by judicial officer of a juvenile court to refer to a juvenile who committed a delinquent act which of committed by an adult he would be prosecuted in a criminal court and convicted as a criminal rather than as a delinquent.
This is a special court which has original jurisdiction over persons statutorily defined by the state as juvenile and over persons alleged to be dependants status offenders and delinquents.
Juvenile delinquency consists of acts of minor infractions of regulation committed by children below the age of 18 or by young persons who are between the age limits of 15 and 17.
Juvenile Justice System:
This is a government agency involved in the investigation, supervision, and adjudication and care of remanding of juveniles whose conduct falls within the jurisdiction of a juvenile court.
Juvenile Reform Homes:
Juvenile reform homes are the homes where delinquent juveniles are kept for corrections and rehabilitations.
Scope of the Study
The scope of this study is Borstal Training Institutes Ganmo, Kwara State. This institute is taken as the research setting, because it is the place where delinquent juveniles are corrected and rehabilitated. In other words, it is a place where delinquent juveniles can be found in large number.
Discussion, Conclusion and Recommendation
The purpose of this study was to investigate the factors influencing juvenile delinquency as expressed by delinquent juveniles in Borstal Training Institute, Ganmo, Ilorin, Kwara State. One hundred and fourty respondents were involved in the conduct of the study. An instrument tagged “Factors Influencing Juvenile Delinquency (FIJDQ) was used to collect the required data for the investigation with respect to religion, age, sex and class level. Four null hypotheses were formulated and tested in the course of this study. This chapter, therefore, contains the discussion of findings, conclusion, implications of the findings, recommendations and suggestions for further studies.
Discussion of Findings
The analysis of responses to the twenty items revealed that item 8 ranked 1st and states that juvenile delinquency is influenced by parents not paying adequate attention to their children. This supports the findings of Bowlby (1969) that infant’s first attachment experience (initially to his or her mother) profoundly shapes the social, cognitive and emotional developments that follow. This responsiveness helps the infant learn the important developmental skill of self-regulation as distress is soothed, needs are met, and alertness enhanced (Bridges 2002).
Item 9 is ranked 2nd and states that lack of parental control influence juvenile delinquency. Several researchers beginning with Baumrind herself have noted that the optimal combination is not high warmth-high control, but rather high warmth-moderate control. Indeed, extremely high levels of parental control create a curvilinear effect – that is, the benefits of control erode of the level of control is too high (Miller 1986; Miller, 2001). In part, researcher believes that moderate control, combined with warmth, allows for incremental and appropriate granting of psychological autonomy to children and adolescents so that they can become more competent (Steinberg, 1994).
Item 4 ranked 3rd and states that exposure of children to drug usage influences juvenile delinquency. This is supported by the studies conducted by NHSDA in 2003. According to NHSDA (2003), in 2001, over six million children lived with at least one parent who abused alcohol or illicit drugs or was dependent on them in the previous year; substance abuse by parents involved up to 10 percent of children aged 5 and younger. In addition, in a longitudinal study of 248 young adults, Brook et.al assessed parental personality, upbringing, and marijuana use in terms of their links to parent – child attachment (Brook, 2000).
Item 16 is ranked 4th and states that the parents socio-economic position influences juvenile delinquencies. Both family and neughbourhood poverty have the potential to affect juvenile behaviour by increasing family stress, forcing a family to more or remain in more dangerous neighbourhood, or requiring a parent to work more hours and thus be less available for family activities and supervision (Taylor et.al, 2002; Klebanor et.al 1994; Paschalt and Hubbard 1998; Voydanoff, 1998). As one researcher put it, reflecting the views of many, “the key process by which economic hardship affects children is via the effects on parenting (McVery, 2002).
Item 18 is ranked 5th and states that dropping out of school influences juvenile delinquency. This is corroborated by Gonzalez (2002) who said that parent involvement – as perceived by the student – predicted a mastery orientation to learning, characterized by persistence, seeking new challenges and overall satisfaction. Not surprisingly, the neglected children repeated grades and had low educational aspirations (Kurtz, Gaudin et.al, 1993).
On the other hand, item 14, which states that lack of adequate education on the dangers of juvenile delinquency influences juvenile delinquency, is not an essential factor influencing juvenile delinquency, it is ranked 19th. This is supported by the researchers who argued that parental care is the most significant factor influencing juvenile delinquency. The researchers noted that the parental presence did not need to occur at a particular time of day; instead overall access to parents and supervision in general seemed to be the significant factors (Blum, 1997).
Closely ranked with item 14 is item 1 which states that parents fighting at home in the presence of their children influences juvenile delinquency. It is ranked 18th. However, previous studies did not support this finding.
Witnessing violence creates its own chain of adverse events, including irritability, immature behaviour, sleep disturbances, emotional distress, fear of being alone, difficulty concentrating in school, aggression, depression, anxiety, and even post-traumatic stress disorder. (Osofsky 1999; Buka, Stichick et.al 2001).
Damboyi (2002) stated that, it is better for a researcher to discuss his/her findings on the basis of each hypothesis. Thus, the present study presents the result of each null hypothesis tested while conducting the investigation. The t-test and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistics were adopted to analyse the hypotheses.
Hypothesis one stated that there is no significant difference in the factors influencing juvenile delinquency as expressed by delinquent juvenile on the basis of gender. The result of the analysis revealed that the hypothesis was accepted. That is, there was no significant difference in the factors influencing juvenile delinquency as expressed by delinquent juveniles on the basis of gender. This finding is not in line with previous studies. Delinquencies are disproportionately committed by young men. Feminist theorists and others have examined why this is the case (Eadia and Morley 2003 p.553). One suggestion is that ideas of masculmity may make young men more likely to offend. Being tough, powerful, aggressive, daring and competitive maybe a way young men attempt to express their masculity (Brown 1998: p.109). Acting out these ideals may make young men more likely to engage in antisocial behaviour (Walklate 2003 p.83).
Hypothesis two stated that there is no significant difference in the factors influencing juvenile delinquencies as expressed by juvenile delinquency on the basis of age. The null hypothesis was accepted. Thus, there was no significant difference in the expression of respondents on factors influencing juvenile delinquencies on the basis of age. This finding agrees with the study of Hoeve (2007) who found that poor parental practices, parental and (or sibling criminality, anti-social parents with attitude that support violence, family conflicts, parents with substance abuse, physical abuse and neglect and family violence are factors influencing juvenile delinquencies. Juvenile delinquencies are common among teens.
Hypotheses three stated that there is no significant difference in the factors influencing juvenile delinquencies by respondent on the basis of religion. The results of the analysis revealed that the null hypothesis was accepted. Thus, there was no significant difference in the expression of respondents on the factors influencing juvenile delinquencies on the basis of religion. This finding agrees with the past studies. Many studies have found a strong correlation between a lack of supervision and offending and it appears to be the most important factor influencing offending (Farrington 2002:610) and Graham and Bowling, 1995:38). Religion has least significant influence on juvenile delinquencies.
Hypothesis four stated that there is no significant difference in the factor influencing juvenile delinquencies on the basis of family type. The null hypothesis was rejected. This shows that there is a significant difference in the factors influencing juvenile delinquencies by respondents on the basis of family type. This finding agrees with the studies of many researchers. There is a weak social bond in polygamous families. This situation is complicated by the fact that aggression, isolation compulsive self-reliance and avoidant attachment seen in abused and neglected children are in that context adaptive survival skills (Zolotor, Kotch et.al 1999, Finzi, Har – Even et.al 2002).
Based on the results of the various analysis in the study, the study came up with the following conclusion:
The major factor influencing juvenile delinquency is parent not paying attention to their children or lack of parental supervision. This is closely followed by lack of parental control of their children anti-social behaviour. Other factors that prominently influenced juvenile delinquency are exposure of children to drug usage, parents’ socio-economic position and dropping out of schools due to continuous failures in school.
Also, the findings revealed that there was no significant difference in the expression of delinquent juveniles on factors influencing juvenile delinquencies based on sex, age, and religion. However, there is a significant difference in the expression of delinquent juveniles on factors influencing juvenile delinquencies on the basis of family type.
Implications of the Findings
The results of this study have pertinent implications for counsellors, researcher, policy makers, and other stakeholders in family institution in our society. The study indicated that some factors are prominent among others that influence juvenile delinquencies. Hence, the phenomenon is an indication that there is family dysfunctionalities and disintegration which are not usually given adequate attention by the counsellors (especially family counsellors), government and stakeholders in family institution. These family dysfunctionalities and disintegrations have led to increased juvenile delinquencies in our society. It is quite unfortunate that it has reached unmanageable proportion. It, therefore, a challenge to counselling profession and other institutions involved in family institution.
In addition, the study equally revealed that government has significant role to play in addressing the problem of juvenile delinquencies in our society. Government should establish juvenile court and reform homes. The juvenile court has to seek the protection and rehabilitation of the delinquent child by determining his/her needs through committal in a juvenile institution. Thus, the role of government cannot be over-emphasized.
Since the respondents were not different in their expression on the factors influencing juvenile delinquencies based on age, sex and religion. It implies that delinquent juveniles have similar positions on juvenile delinquencies. Thus, family counsellors and other appropriate personnel would find it easy to provide information for the parents of delinquent children irrespective of their age, religion and gender.
Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:
(a) Family Therapy:
Multisystem Therapy (MST) should be adopted. MST is a family – oriented, home – based program targeting chronically violent, substance – abusing juvenile offenders aged 12 to 17. To change how youth function at home, at school, and within neighbourhood, MST promotes positive social behaviour (at the same time, attempting to decrease anti-social behaviour). The home – based model should be designed to overcome barriers that may prevent families from accessing services. The therapists (family counsellors) should focus on empowering parents, improving their effectiveness (identifying strengths and developing natural support systems), removing barriers (e.g. parent substance use, stress, conflict between partners). After these issues are addressed, the parents should work with the therapists to develop strategies for setting and enforcing curfews and rules, decreasing their children’s involvement with deviant peers, promoting friendship with prosocial peers, improving academic and/or vocational performance, and even addressing neighbourhood criminal subcultures.
(b) School Based Programs:
There is the need for school based programs that will enhance strong bonds of juveniles to school and family. This will protect juveniles from socially unacceptable behaviours. Bonding to school and family is achieved through, enhanced opportunities and reinforcement both at home and at school, all designed to increase children’s social competencies. This intervention should include three components: teacher training, child social and emotional skill development, and parent training. These should be done by family counsellors.
(c) Listening to Children (LTC):
This program emphasized parental self-reflection, social support, and addressing the emotional roots of children’s misbehaviour and of parenting stress.
(d) Family Effectiveness Training (FET):
This program should target children between the ages of 6 and 12. This intervention should address family functioning, parent-child conflicts, and cultural conflicts between children and parents. Family topics should include; family development, parent-child communication, conflict resolution skills, parental nurturance and behaviour control, family cohesiveness, and parenting skills regarding managing children’s peer relations. The format should include didactic lessons and activities as well as planned family discussions in which a therapist/facilitator will intervene.
(e) Juvenile courts and Reform Homes:
There is the need for juvenile courts and reform homes. Juvenile courts should be established to handle cases of juvenile delinquencies, and the courts should be lenient in handling juvenile criminal cases. Also, reform homes should be established to reform and rehabilitate the delinquent juveniles, family counsellors are much more needed in reform homes.
Suggestions for Further Studies
This study was limited to investigating factors influencing juvenile delinquencies as expressed by delinquent juveniles in Borstal Training Institute, Ganmo, Ilorin, Kwara State. Subsequent studies may consider the following areas:
- Effects of juvenile delinquencies as expressed by delinquent juveniles in Borstal Training Institute, Ganmo, Ilorin, Kwara State.
- Factors influencing juvenile delinquencies as expressed by delinquent juveniles in reform home, Oko-Erin Ilorin, Kwara State.
Factors Influencing Juvenile Delinquencies Among Juvenile In Borstal Training Institute Ganmo, Kwara State.
The complete material will be sent to you in just 2 steps.
Quick & Simple…
Make payment of ₦3,000: through USSD Transfer, Bank Mobile App, ATM Transfer, or POS Transfer to:
|Account No.: 0811003731|
|Name: Samphina Academy|
|Account Type: Current|
Or Click Here to pay with Debit Card
|FOR CLIENTS OUTSIDE NIGERIA:|
|Click Here to pay with Debit Card ($15)|
|GHANA – Make Payment of 60 GHS to MTN MoMo, 0553978005, Douglas Osabutey|
Send the following details through Text Message or WhatsApp Messenger | +234-8143831497
- Payment Details
- Email Address
- Factors Influencing Juvenile Delinquencies Among Juvenile In Borstal Training Institute Ganmo, Kwara State.
The complete material will be sent to your email address after receiving your payment information | T & C Apply
You may also like:
This research material “Factors Influencing Juvenile Delinquencies Among Juvenile In Borstal Training Institute Ganmo, Kwara State.” is for research purposes and should be used as a guide in developing your research project / seminar work. For no reason should you copy word for word (verbatim) as samphina.com.ng will not be liable for any who copied the material.
The aim of providing this material is to reduce the stress of moving from one school library to another all in the name of searching for research materials. This service is legal because, all institutions permit their students to read previous projects, books, articles or papers while developing their own works. According to Austin Kleon “All creative work builds on what came before”.
samphina.com.ng is only providing this material “Factors Influencing Juvenile Delinquencies Among Juvenile In Borstal Training Institute Ganmo, Kwara State.” as a reference for your research. The paper should be used as a guide or framework for your own paper. The contents of this paper should be able to help you in generating new ideas and thoughts for your own research. Use it as a guidance purpose only.
How to defend your research work
This is a general guide on how to defend your research work:
1. Prepare For Questions:
If you are preparing for questions that may be asked during your defense, then your answers will flow smoothly and effectively. This will prove your knowledge on the subject e.g “Factors Influencing Juvenile Delinquencies Among Juvenile In Borstal Training Institute Ganmo, Kwara State.“, and strengthening your argument. Ask friends and family, read your work for them to listen to your presentation, and write down questions. You may be lucky the panel will ask you those you have already prepared on.
2. Strong Summary:
Summarizing your chapters will help keep your audience focused because it is easy for a mind to drift, so providing summaries will ensure your panel will follow along, even if they lose focus for a brief moment. Visual aides, such as graphs and power-point presentations can be very helpful. If you are going to use these, make sure you will practice your presentation with them.
3. Be Confident in Your Research Work:
Not knowing your topic “Factors Influencing Juvenile Delinquencies Among Juvenile In Borstal Training Institute Ganmo, Kwara State.” inside out will cause you to struggle and ultimately fail with your defense. You need to know the subject from every angle to ensure you are fully prepared for any question that may come your way.
Reinforce your findings to conclude your defense. The finale of your presentation should focus on proving the work that has been done. You may need to recap on what has changed and remained unchanged, if is necessary.
5 . Listen:
Before you get defensive or recite a particular answer, make sure you truly understand the question being asked. Being a good listener is an important quality, because providing an inaccurate or off-topic answer will also weaken the validity of your paper.