A Comparative Analysis Of The Conflict Situations And Choice Of Laws In The Nigerian Legal System And Other Legal Systems

Project and Seminar Material for Law

A Comparative Analysis Of The Conflict Situations And Choice Of Laws In The Nigerian Legal System And Other Legal Systems


Abstract


The study provided a comparative Analysis Of The Conflict Situations And Choice Of Laws In The Nigerian Legal System And Other Legal Systems. The specific objectives were geared towards describing the operation of the legal system in cases of conflicting laws and the choice of laws considering the relevance of foreign judgement and international laws.


Chapter One


General Introduction

1.0 Introduction

The project looks into the problems which arise when one legal system has to deal with the legal rules of another in matters of private rights. More particularly, because the ultimate test of the recognition of foreign law is what courts do about it. This work is also concerned with how a court, sitting in one country treats a case of private litigation in which the parties, the events or the circumstances demonstrate connections with one or more legal systems foreign to the court. The issue can raise in multifarious ways. An ordinary, apparently purely domestic, case may be found to have a significant connection with a foreign legal system. A case may be so genuinely international that it would be a foreign case in any court.

In Tapa v. Kuka , the deceased, a Nupe man died interstate in Bida, leaving a house in Lagos. The question was whether his domestic law should apply or the law of the place where the property was located, that is, lex situs? The deceased’s personal law was applied which is the Mohammedian law, prevailing among the Nupe people. This shows that the forms of appearance of a foreign element are numerous:

  • The party may be foreign by nationality or may have a foreign domicile,
  • The action may concern property situated abroad,
  • Or a disposition made abroad of a property situated in Nigeria.

Just as the conflict of law exists because there are differences in systems of municipal law, so there are differences in the approaches that legal systems of Nigeria and other countries take to solving problems in the conflict of laws.


1.1 Background To The Study

The raison d’être of Private International Law, also known as, conflict of law is the existence in the world of a number of separate municipal systems of law–a number of separate legal units- that differ greatly from each other in the rules by which they regulate the various legal relations arising in daily life. The occasions are frequent when the courts in one country must take account of some rule of law that exists in another.

There are several possible responses which a court can make when faced with a case having foreign contacts. Firstly, and most primitively, it can treat the case as a purely domestic one and apply its own law to its resolution regardless of the foreign element.

Secondly, a court could take a view that its processes are inappropriate for a case with foreign contacts and refuse to adjudicate upon it. A court would seek to ensure that national courts took jurisdiction only when they were, in their own eyes, the appropriate forum or, at least, not an inappropriate one. The remaining possibility, and the one with which this book is concerned, is that the court recognizes that cases with foreign contacts cannot simply be turned away, and that they are special in the sense that they pose particular problems which demand serious treatment.


1.2 Objectives Of Study

The overall objective of this study is to examine the differences between the Nigerian domestic law and other legal systems and find solutions to the conflict problems.

Specifically, the study aims at achieving the following:

  1. To examine and prescribe the conditions under which the court is competent to entertain a claim.
  2. To examine and determine for each class of case the particular municipal system of law by reference to which the rights of the parties must be ascertained.
  3. To examine and specify the circumstances in which (a) a foreign judgment can be recognized as decisive of the question in dispute and
  4. The right vested in the judgment creditor by a foreign judgment can be enforced by an action in Nigeria.
  5. To shed light on the level of experience and the depth of knowledge of Nigeria and some other countries in relation to private international law and how judges apply the principles of private international law.

1.3 Focus Of Study

The main focus of this study is based on cases where there are conflict between various municipal laws, be it within of outside a sovereign State, which then results to the choosing of a particular system to govern such. Special attention will be given to the Nigerian legal system in comparison and contrast with other legal systems.


1.4 Scope Of Study

Private international law is not a separate branch of law in the same sense, as, say, the law of contract or of tort. It is all pervading. ‘It starts up unexpectedly in any court and in the midst of any process. It may be sprung like a mine in a plain common law action. In an administrative proceeding, in equity, or in a divorce case, or a bankruptcy case, in a shipping case or a matter of criminal procedure. The most trivial action of debt, the most complex case of equitable claims may suddenly be interrupted by the appearance of a knot to be untied only by a Private International Law.’

Nevertheless, Private International Law is a separate and distinct unit in the Nigerian Legal System just as much as the law of tort or of contract, but it possesses this unity, not because it deals with one particular topic but because it is always concerned with one or more of the three (3) questions, namely:

  1. Jurisdiction of the Nigerian court,
  2. The choice of law,
  3. Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments.

All branches of private law will be considered, but only in connection with these three matters.


1.5 Methodology

The method to be adopted for this study will be based on primary and secondary sources (materials.) They include statutes, local and foreign textbooks, law journals, law dictionaries, opinions of legal writers, law reports and reported cases from case books, available literature on internet. Also, the historical, analytical and ethical methods are employed to dive deep into the study and have a good understanding of it.


1.6 Literature Review

‘Conflict of law and choice situation under which this topic is based is a wide area of study. Reference will be made to several foreign and Nigerian texts by distinguished authors. Various journals will also be referred to.

CHESHIRE AND NORTH’S Private International Law states that ‘Private International Law, then, is that part of law which comes into play when the issue before the court affects some fact, event or transaction that is so closely connected with a foreign system of law as to necessitate recourse to that system.’ It has, accordingly, been described by THOMAS BATY as meaning The rules voluntarily chosen by a given State for the decision of cases which have a foreign complexion.

OBILADE A.O. on his own part believed t hat there are statutory choices of laws for determining inappropriate cases whether it is a customary law or non-customary law that governs a particular set of circumstances. He also opined that the rule of customary law is an alternative to English law and the customary law to be valid it must have passed the incompatibility test. He appreciated the fact that there is conflict between the English law and the rule of customary law and also that there may be the problem of which choice of customary to apply when two customary laws compete on the same subject matter.

According to RAYMOND SMITH, in his book, Conflict of Laws , he is of the opinion that a case with obvious contacts with one country may happen to be litigated in another because the plaintiff finds some advantage in bringing an action there or the defendant cannot be made subject to the jurisdiction of the country with which the case is, leally, most closely connected. A case may be so genuinely international that it would be a foreign case in any court.

ASEIN J.O. is of the view that there can be conflict between the rules of customary law and English law especially on marriage and succession cases. Therefore, if a person is subjected to two different laws at the same time, then, the problem is which of the rules will be applicable to the person.


1.7 Definition Of Terms

Conflict lawyers use some Latin terms which have been adopted or derived from continental writers.

Lex cause:

The law which the court has determined as the governing law of the issue.

Lex domicile:

The law of the country where a person is domiciled.

Lex fori:

The law of the court dealing with the issue. Where a Nigerian court decides to its own law regardless of the conflict issue it applies Nigerian law as lex fori; where, however it determines upon the application of Nigerian law as a result of operating its choice of law rules, it applies English law as lex causae.

Lex loci actus:

The law of the place where an act was done.

Lex loci contractus:

The law of the place where a contract was made.

Lex loci delicti:

The law of the place where the wrongful act (tort) was committed

Lex loci celebrationis:

The law of the place where a marriage was celebrated.

Lex solutionis:

The law of the place where the contract is to be performed.

Lex patriae:

The law of the nationality.

Lex propria causae:

The proper law.

Lex propria delicti:

The proper law of tort.

Lex situs:

The law of the place where a thing is situated, particularly but not exclusively, a piece of land.

Locus regit actum:

The law of the place governs the deed. An old maxim that finds its modern expression in the lex loci rules listed above.


Chapter Five


Conclusion And Recommendations

5.1 Conclusion

The English Law Commission is reviewing the choice of law rules in tort and has published a working paper containing provisional proposals for the reform of the law. After considering and rejecting the desirability of adopting governmental interest analysis or some other American approach, it puts forward two alternative models as possible replacements of the present law.

The general rule would be that the law of the country where the tort occurred would govern, but this would be subject to a proper law exception: the lex loci delicti could be displaced, and the law of the country with which the occurrence and the parties had, at the time of occurrence, the closest and most real connection applied instead. This exception would however be subject to the threshold requirement that the occurrence and the parties must have an insignificant connection with the country where the tort occurred, and a substantial connection with the other country.

The broad effect of this dissertation would be to substitute for the existing normal rule of double actionability, subject to a proper law exception, a normal rule that the lex loci delicti alone governs, subject to such an exception. This abolition of the first branch of Phillips v Eyre (the requirement of actionability by English law) is likely to be widely welcomed. However, in the interests of certainty, a more precise threshold requirement for the displacement of the normal rule would be desirable, and if the proper law exception is to have any real content, the courts would have to develop criteria for judging connections asmore or less ‘close’ or ‘real’. As suggested above, the lex loci delicti will seldom if ever be inappropriate, whether from the aspect of justice between the parties or of the public interests of countries, unless the parties belong to the same country (not being the country where the tort was committed), or if they belong to different countries, the laws of those countries concur on the issue in question. A threshold requirement on such lines would provide greater uncertainty that the one proposed. It is really only when such a threshold requirement is satisfied that the difficult problems of choice of law in tort arise: to decide whether the lex loci delicti or the law of the parties’ law is that they will all both receive justice according to their own standards. However, in some cases, usually involving intentional conduct on the defendant’s part, justice may be thought to require that the defendant should be able to rely on a reasonable expectation of non-liability under the law of the country where he acted. For example, in a defamation case the defendant may have published his statement in reliance of the communication being privileged under the lex loci delicti. In other cases, the relevant rules of the lex loci delicti may be of fundamental public importance (for example rules relating to false imprisonment), and where that is shown to be the case it may well be appropriate for those rules to be applied rather than those of the parties’ countries. Any sort of ‘closest connection’ or other proper law formula needs such (or different) guidelines, developed by the courts if not contained in the reforming statute.


5.2 Recommendations

Law Commission’s working paper has the proper law as the general rule: the applicable law is that of the country with which the occurrence and the parties had, at the time of the occurrence, the closest and most real connection. But the result is not very different from Model I, because it is presumed that the country with which the occurrence and the parties had the closest and most real connection is that where the tort occurred, and the presumption can only be departed from if the same threshold requirement as in is satisfied. As the vagueness of a proper law approach seems to a regrettable necessity for a minority of cases rather than a positive virtue, Model I would seem to be the better of the two approaches.

The Working Paper also makes provisional recommendations as to which should be regarded as the law of the country where the tort occurred in multi-state cases: in cases of personal injury or damage to property, the country where the injury was suffered; in cases of defamation, the country of publication; in other cases, the country where the most significant elements in the train of events occurred. A possible qualification to such an approach was suggested above.


A Comparative Analysis Of The Conflict Situations And Choice Of Laws In The Nigerian Legal System And Other Legal Systems


Project Material Download

3,000 Naira


The complete material will be sent to you in just 2 steps.

Quick & Simple…


Step One Purchase

Make payment of ₦3,000: through USSD Transfer, Bank Mobile App, ATM Transfer, or POS Transfer to:

Access Bank PlcAccount No.: 0811003731
Name: Samphina Academy
Account Type: Current

Or Click Here to pay with Debit Card

FOR CLIENTS OUTSIDE NIGERIA:
Click Here to pay with Debit Card ($15)
GHANA – Make Payment of 60 GHS to MTN MoMo, 0553978005, Douglas Osabutey 

  PAY WITH CRYPTOCURRENCY


Step Two Purchase

Send the following details through Text Message or WhatsApp Messenger | +234-8143831497

  • Payment Details 
  • Email Address 
  • A Comparative Analysis Of The Conflict Situations And Choice Of Laws In The Nigerian Legal System And Other Legal Systems

The complete material will be sent to your email address after receiving your payment information | T & C Apply


  Contact Our Help Desk


You may also like:

⚠️ Need a different topic? Perform a quick search



Get A Complete Business Plan For Any Business In Nigeria

Business Plan for Businesses in Nigeria

  Business Plans in Nigeria


Disclaimer


This research material “A Comparative Analysis Of The Conflict Situations And Choice Of Laws In The Nigerian Legal System And Other Legal Systems” is for research purposes and should be used as a guide in developing your research project / seminar work. For no reason should you copy word for word (verbatim) as samphina.com.ng will not be liable for any who copied the material.

The aim of providing this material is to reduce the stress of moving from one school library to another all in the name of searching for research materials. This service is legal because, all institutions permit their students to read previous projects, books, articles or papers while developing their own works. According to Austin Kleon “All creative work builds on what came before”.

samphina.com.ng is only providing this material “A Comparative Analysis Of The Conflict Situations And Choice Of Laws In The Nigerian Legal System And Other Legal Systems” as a reference for your research. The paper should be used as a guide or framework for your own paper. The contents of this paper should be able to help you in generating new ideas and thoughts for your own research. Use it as a guidance purpose only.

Samphina Academy

Samphina Academy is an Online Educational Resource Center that is aimed at providing students with quality information and materials to aid them in succeeding in their academic pursuit.